D. H. Kim
To Win
K. Morisaki
To Win
Naomi Cheong vs Kanako Morisaki Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L W W L W L
Form
L W W W L L L W L LHead To Head: Cheong 1 - 0 Morisaki
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cheong winning 2 and Morisaki winning 0. The last match between Cheong and Morisaki was at the W100 Tokyo, 11-11-2019, Q1 round, Hard with Naomi Cheong getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Naomi Cheong | 1 |
| Kanako Morisaki | 0 |
W100 Tokyo(11-11-2019)
6
3
6
2
| Cheong | Stats | Morisaki |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (4-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 847 |
| 485 | Highest Rank | 637 |
| 22 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (46-35) | Career Total W/L | 51% (112-107) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Mertens PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tiafoe VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Naomi Cheong
Player
Kanako Morisaki
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:10:0 | Average Match Time | 1:10:0 |
| 64% (37/58) | 1st Serve % | 64% (38/59) |
| 68% (25/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (22/38) |
| 57% (12/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (7/21) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 51% (30/59) | Return Points Win % | 36% (21/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Naomi Cheong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Danilina
Player
Naomi Cheong
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Cheong
Player
Hind Abdelouahid
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marcela Zacarias
Player
Naomi Cheong
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naomi Cheong
Player
Valentina Ivanov
47%
(
47 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
98)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
7
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(4) 7-6(3) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Xiaodi You
Player
Naomi Cheong
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
25 of
35)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naomi Cheong
Player
Nana Kawagishi
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naomi Cheong
Player
Kanako Morisaki
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mei Yamaguchi
Player
Naomi Cheong
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
78%
(
35 of
45)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
52%
(
13 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
49%
(
18 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
46
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Kanako Morisaki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Kanako Morisaki
70%
(
64 of
92)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kanako Morisaki
Player
Sera Nishimoto
49%
(
17 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natsuki Yoshimoto
Player
Kanako Morisaki
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Sohyun Park
Player
Kanako Morisaki
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
80%
(
37 of
46)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kanako Morisaki
Player
Pranjala Yadlapalli
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kanako Morisaki
Player
Prathyusha Rachapudi
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
50%
(
60 of
119)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
13
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
45%
(
45 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
64 of
119)
118
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kanako Morisaki
Player
Unknown Player
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fangran Tian
Player
Kanako Morisaki
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (46/35) | Win/Loss | 51% (112/107) |
| 54% (99/84) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (247/240) |
| 52% (859/786) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2253/2162) |
| 51% (27/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (63/59) |
| 50% (4/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 38% (13/21) |
| 75% (15/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (34/22) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 30 | Aces Total | 161 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 190 | Total Double Faults | 528 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:1:42 |
| 491.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 447.93 |
| 57% (1561/2746) | 1st Serve % | 67% (6130/9207) |
| 58% (911/1561) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (3578/6130) |
| 44% (522/1185) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1331/3077) |
| 46% (166/359) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (519/1052) |
| 46% (1245/2707) | Return Points Win % | 45% (4028/8890) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (36/28) | Challenger W/L | 47% (75/83) |
| 59% (10/7) | Futures W/L | 61% (37/24) |
| 57% (45/79) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (110/216) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 64% (7/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (13/27) |
| 63% (15/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (26/50) |
| 84% (44/37) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (111/93) |
| 16% (44/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (111/18) |
| 22% (36/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (108/19) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
